Untitled[]
On TotW:RM2's template, the name is Twinsword. Which of them is the most "right"?
Penamesolen 22:58, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Twinsword. "Soukenshi" (双剣士?) would have been translated as "dual/twin/double swordsman", but according to a745 on her Abyssal Chronicles site, this name and "Brandish" are listed officially on "Tales of Magazine Volume 4, pages 42-45". I imagine it would be changed during localization (if we get one), but for now this is the official name.
- Mayu Miyuki 23:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you for the help ^^. Should I redirect this one, or copy/paste it on the new Twinsword page?
- Penamesolen 23:26, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Reepmhasis: The correct name is Twinsword. Don't move the page again.
Byakuren Hijiri (talk) 14:03, October 11, 2009 (UTC)
Honest mistake. I'm sorry, if you guys have any problems come talk to me. LloydIrving--
Appearances section[]
I'm sure I am not the only one who sees how redundant it is to list each of the RadiMai games separately if the text is only going to be a copy of previous sentences. In cases like this, it's practically the same as having a single sentence represent a whole section-- in fact, it may as well be less than a single sentence if the content is almost exactly the same as it is in the previous section with nothing new or informative to offset the repetition.
My solution would be to merge the sections into a "Tales of the World: Radiant Mythology 2 and 3" section, or "[...] Radiant Mythology series" if all three games are involved. Likewise with "[...] Narikiri Dungeon 2 and 3", since the original game has nothing to do with the others which carry that subtitle. This allows all relevant games to be represented in its own paragraph if a paragraph is worth having for it. All redundant statements should be removed, and focus on games succeeding the first appearance in the given series should relate only to differences. As fascinating as sentences like "Twinsword is a job" can be, it's pointless to say because the previous section already says the same in a more useful and informative way. Then again, even that first sentence of the previous section is redundant: "this makes an appearance as a potential job option as a job."
Of course, if there is indeed enough information to warrant different sections for each game, then of course they should be kept separate. It's just that the RadiMai series is not exactly known for being innovative in practically every aspect of gameplay, but I don't mind being proven wrong or misguided.
Byakuren Hijiri (talk) 09:51, November 16, 2011 (UTC)